> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://wiki.oriya.live/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://wiki.oriya.live/core-concepts/storyteller-vs-character.md).
# Storyteller vs Character
## Storyteller vs. Character
**You are Nobody pretending to be Somebody.**
Most people forget.
This isn't philosophy. This is the operating principle behind every transformation framework ever written—and the reason most of them fail.
**If you already recognize yourself as awareness playing a role:** You don't need this page. Go live it. This is remedial.
**Still here?** Let's debug the confusion.
***
{% hint style="info" %}
**KEY IDEA**
The journey is remembering you're the **storyteller** (awareness), not only the **character** (constructed identity).
**Somebody (Character):** The conditioned identity—history, wounds, goals, defenses, the whole psychological structure.
**Nobody (Storyteller):** The awareness witnessing everything; the space the story appears in.
You are both—but **forgetting the storyteller is Act 1**, **remembering is Beat 11**, and **living it daily is Act 4**.
{% endhint %}
***
### The Core Teaching
```
AWARENESS (Nobody)
↓
plays as
↓
IDENTITY (Somebody)
↓
forgets it's playing
↓
SUFFERS IN CHARACTER
↓
seeks freedom
↓
REMEMBERS THE STORYTELLER
↓
continues playing
↓
INTEGRATED PARTICIPATION
```
**Translation:**
Consciousness (Nobody) creates a character (Somebody) so convincing that it forgets it's consciousness. Then spends Acts 1-3 trying to fix the character from within the character. Then remembers in Beat 11: "Oh. I wrote this."
**The shift isn't becoming Nobody.** You already are Nobody. The shift is **remembering** while still playing Somebody.
**Tuesday morning:** The role continues. The fusion dissolves.
***
### What Is This Distinction?
{% tabs %}
{% tab title="Somebody (Character)" %}
**The constructed identity you think you are:**
**Components:**
* Personal history and interpretation
* Core wounds and compensations (Act 1)
* Beliefs about self, others, world
* Goals, fears, preferences
* Survival strategies
* The whole psychological structure
**How it operates:**
* Takes everything personally
* Defends the story
* Needs to be right
* Problems feel existential
* Identity must be maintained
* "This is who I am"
**Observable pattern:** Complete identification. You **are** the character. No distance. No space. The story runs you.
**Tuesday morning:** Criticism lands → you shatter.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Nobody (Storyteller)" %}
**The awareness that was here before the character formed:**
**Characteristics:**
* Witnessing presence
* Space that stories appear in
* Not a thing—the knowing of things
* Was there before conditioning
* Remains through all changes
* Can't be damaged by story
**How it operates:**
* Watches the character play
* Doesn't take story personally
* Responds without defending
* Problems are patterns, not threats
* Identity is playable, adjustable
* "This is what I'm experiencing"
**Observable pattern:** Spacious awareness. You **notice** the character. Distance appears. Response replaces reaction.
**Tuesday morning:** Criticism lands → notice it, feel it, respond clearly, remain intact.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="The Integration (Act 4)" %}
**Nobody playing Somebody consciously:**
This isn't:
* ❌ Detachment or dissociation
* ❌ Spiritual bypass
* ❌ Transcending the human
* ❌ Perfect equanimity
* ❌ Never getting triggered
This is:
* ✅ Awareness holding identity lightly
* ✅ Feeling fully while identified less
* ✅ Playing the role with integrity
* ✅ Getting triggered—and recovering faster
* ✅ Human mess included
**The marker:** Life continues. Bills, boundaries, dishes, relationships. But the center is spacious, the grip is lighter, and recovery is quicker.
**What Act 4 looks like:** Same character. Same story. But Nobody is driving now.
{% endtab %}
{% endtabs %}
***
### How the Confusion Happens: The Forgetting Mechanism
{% hint style="info" %}
**The Arc of Forgetting → Remembering**
This isn't linear. You don't go through these once. You cycle through repeatedly, each time with more awareness, until the pattern becomes obvious and the grip loosens.
{% endhint %}
#### The Standard Pattern
| Phase | What Happens | Location |
| ----------- | -------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| **Beat 1** | Born as presence—Nobody is here | Opening Image |
| **Beat 2** | Original Drama installs a core lie | Original Drama |
| **Act 1** | The lie hardens into identity: "I am Somebody" | Forgetting |
| **Act 2** | Somebody tries to fix Somebody (tools, techniques) | Seeking |
| **Act 3** | Identity collapses; the structure dissolves | Journey In |
| **Beat 11** | Direct recognition: "I am Nobody" | Remembering |
| **Act 4** | Nobody plays Somebody consciously | The Missing Act |
**The joke:** You use character-level techniques (Act 2) to fix character-level problems (Act 1) until you realize **you're not the character** (Beat 11), then continue living as the character anyway (Act 4)—but now you know you're the storyteller.
***
### Observable Differences: How to Tell Where You Are
#### Diagnostic Table
| Signal | Living as Somebody | Resting as Nobody |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| **Criticism arrives** | Take it personally, defend or collapse | Notice it, feel it, assess utility, respond |
| **Plans fall apart** | Identity crisis, "What's wrong with me?" | Pattern recognition, "What's useful here?" |
| **Success happens** | Temporary relief, then worry about losing it | Acknowledge it, continue |
| **Mistake made** | Self-attack, shame spiral | "That happened. What's the repair?" |
| **Strong emotion** | "I am angry" (fusion) | "Anger is present" (space) |
| **Old pattern runs** | Automatic, no choice | Notice it mid-pattern, choice appears |
| **Tuesday 10am stress** | React from wound | Respond from awareness |
{% hint style="success" %}
**Checkpoint: Recognition Test**
Can you notice the difference between:
* **Being angry** vs. **Noticing anger is present**
* **"I am anxious"** vs. **"Anxiety is here"**
* **Being the story** vs. **Watching the story**
If yes, even briefly: Nobody is online. You can close this page.
If no: Keep reading. Pattern recognition builds over time.
{% endhint %}
***
### The Transition States: What Happens Between Character and Storyteller
Most people don't shift cleanly from Somebody → Nobody. There are predictable transition phases.
{% tabs %}
{% tab title="Phase 1: Complete Identification" %}
**Location:** Act 1 → Early Act 2
**What it feels like:**
* "I **am** this story"
* No distance from identity
* Can't see the pattern
* Problems feel personal and permanent
* Total fusion with character
**Tuesday test:** Pattern runs automatically. No space. No choice.
**Common thought:** "This is just who I am."
**What's needed:** Begin pattern recognition. Start seeing "This is Act 1 code running" instead of "This is me."
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Phase 2: Watching the Pattern" %}
**Location:** Late Act 2 → Early Act 3
**What it feels like:**
* "I can **see** this story"
* Moments of distance
* Pattern becomes visible mid-pattern
* Problems feel workable
* Flickering between fusion and space
**Tuesday test:** Notice the pattern while it's running. Micro-pause appears. Choice begins.
**Common thought:** "Oh, there's that pattern again."
**What's needed:** Build the muscle of noticing. Practice returning to awareness.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Phase 3: Direct Recognition" %}
**Location:** Beat 11
**What it feels like:**
* "I **wrote** this story"
* Clear seeing: "I am awareness, not the content"
* Identity seen as construct
* Problems are content in awareness
* Stable recognition (even if fleeting)
**Tuesday test:** Remain clear even when triggered. Pattern runs, awareness remains.
**Common thought:** "Oh. **This** has always been here."
**What's needed:** Nothing. This is the recognition. Now integrate it.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Phase 4: Integrated Living" %}
**Location:** Act 4
**What it feels like:**
* "I'm **playing** this story"
* Character continues, fusion doesn't
* Identity held lightly
* Problems are practical, not existential
* Somebody and Nobody both present
**Tuesday test:** Triggered? Feel it fully, recover quickly, respond clearly.
**Common thought:** "The role continues. I'm not trapped in it."
**What's needed:** Keep practicing. The integration deepens with living.
{% endtab %}
{% endtabs %}
***
### Authority & Research Foundation
{% hint style="info" %}
**Why this isn't spiritual fantasy:**
The distinction between constructed self (Somebody) and witnessing awareness (Nobody) is documented across neuroscience, contemplative traditions, and developmental psychology. We're mapping what's observable, not inventing metaphysics.
{% endhint %}
Default Mode Network & Narrative Self (Neuroscience)
The DMN (default mode network) generates and maintains the "me" story—autobiographical memory, self-referential processing, mind-wandering about personal concerns.
**Key finding:** When DMN activity quiets (meditation, flow states, psychedelics), the sense of separate self softens and bare awareness becomes evident.
**Translation:** "Somebody" is neurally constructed. "Nobody" is the prior witnessing that doesn't require DMN activity.
**Sources:**
* Menon, V. & Uddin, L.Q. (2010). "Saliency, switching, attention and control" — [Link](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899886/)
* Raichle, M. (2015). "The Brain's Default Mode Network" — [Link](https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030)
* Brewer, J. et al. (2011). "Meditation experience associated with decreased DMN activity" — [Link](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112029108)
Self-as-Context (Relational Frame Theory)
RFT distinguishes:
* **Conceptualized self:** The story ("I'm broken," "I'm a leader")
* **Self-as-context:** The perspective from which all experiences are known
You can change content without changing the observer. The observer is constant; the observed changes.
**Translation:** Character = conceptualized self. Storyteller = self-as-context.
**Sources:**
* Hayes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. (2001). *Relational Frame Theory* — [Link](https://contextualscience.org/relational_frame_theory)
* ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) uses this clinically
Subject-Object Theory (Kegan)
Development is the process of making **subject** (what you are) into **object** (what you have/observe).
Early: You **are** your emotions (subject) Later: You **have** emotions and can observe them (object)
Eventually: You **are** awareness, you **have** a self-concept.
**Translation:** Moving from Somebody (subject) to Nobody witnessing Somebody (object).
**Source:**
* Kegan, R. *The Evolving Self* — [Link](https://hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674272316)
Nondual Awareness (Contemplative Traditions)
Cross-cultural teaching:
* Vedanta: **Atman** (true self) vs. **jiva** (individual ego)
* Buddhism: **Buddha-nature** vs. **conditioned self**
* Sufism: **Essence** vs. **personality**
* Dzogchen: **Rigpa** (awareness) vs. **sem** (conceptual mind)
Same map, different languages: You are the space in which experience happens, not the experience itself.
**Sources:**
* Ramana Maharshi: Self-inquiry ("Who am I?") — [Link](https://www.sriramanamaharshi.org/)
* Nisargadatta: *I Am That* — Pure awareness teaching
* Adyashanti: *The End of Your World* — Post-awakening integration — [Link](https://www.adyashanti.org/)
Narrative Identity Research (Psychology)
Dan McAdams: We construct identity through **narrative**—the story we tell about who we are.
The story changes over time. The narrator remains.
**Translation:** The character (narrative identity) is constructed. The storyteller (awareness) is prior.
**Source:**
* McAdams, D. (2001). "The Psychology of Life Stories" — [Link](https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100)
**Why this matters:**
The Storyteller vs. Character distinction isn't metaphysical speculation. It's observable, researchable, and practically verifiable.
**Tuesday test:** Can you notice the difference? That's the proof.
***
### Common Confusions & Traps
{% hint style="warning" %}
**This Teaching Can Be Misused**
Like all powerful maps, "Storyteller vs. Character" can become bypass, dissociation, or spiritual performance. Here's how to spot when you've gone sideways.
{% endhint %}
#### The Confusions
{% tabs %}
{% tab title="Bypass: " %}
**The confusion:** "I'm awareness. This is all illusion. Nothing matters. Why bother with bills, boundaries, relationships, responsibility?"
**Why it's bypass:** You're using Nobody language to avoid Somebody work. Classic Act 2 → Act 0 bypass.
**The reality:** **Nobody cares deeply—because life is happening as Somebody.** Presence includes engagement, not detachment.
**Tuesday test:**
* Bypass: Bills unpaid, relationships neglected, "I'm beyond that"
* Integration: Bills paid, relationships tended, "I'm responsible for this"
**The teaching:** Act 4 isn't transcending the human. It's Nobody playing Somebody with full integrity.
**See:** Integration vs. Bypassing
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Dissociation: " %}
**The confusion:** "I'm the witness. I observe anger, I don't feel it. I'm detached from emotion."
**Why it's dissociation:** You're using awareness language to numb out. That's trauma response, not recognition.
**The reality:** **Nobody feels everything.** The difference isn't less feeling—it's less fusion with feeling.
**Comparison:**
| Dissociation | Integration |
| ---------------------- | ---------------------- |
| "I don't feel anger" | "Anger is fully felt" |
| Numbing, disconnection | Feeling without fusion |
| Emotion is avoided | Emotion is included |
| Protection mechanism | Spacious allowing |
**Tuesday test:**
* Dissociation: Flat affect, "I'm beyond emotion"
* Integration: Full feeling, "Emotion is here, I remain clear"
**The teaching:** Act 4 includes the body, the nervous system, the emotion—with space around it.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Performance: " %}
**The confusion:** Using "I am awareness" as spiritual identity. Performing Nobody. Making it special.
**Why it's trap:** You've just upgraded Somebody to "spiritual Somebody." Still character. Different costume.
**The reality:** **Nobody isn't special.** It's ordinary presence. When it becomes identity, you're back in Act 2.
**Tuesday test:**
* Performance: "I've transcended ego" (ego statement)
* Integration: \[silence, or honest admission of struggle]
**The teaching:** If you're talking about being Nobody, you're probably stuck in Somebody. Nobody doesn't announce itself.
{% endtab %}
{% tab title="Trying: " %}
**The confusion:** Treating Nobody as achievement. "I need to get to awareness." "When will I become the witness?"
**Why it fails:** **You can't become what you are.** Nobody isn't the destination—it's what's looking for the destination.
**The reality:** Recognition, not achievement. Nobody is already here. You're looking FROM it, not FOR it.
**What to do:** Stop trying to become Nobody. Notice you're already the one watching the trying.
**Tuesday test:**
* Trying: Effort, strain, "Am I there yet?"
* Recognition: "Oh. This was always here."
**The teaching:** Beat 11 isn't arrival. It's recognition of what never left.
{% endtab %}
{% endtabs %}
***
### The Practical Difference: Tuesday Test Applied
{% hint style="success" %}
**The Standard**
Real recognition isn't measured by meditation depth or insight experiences. It's measured by what happens Tuesday morning at 10 a.m. when criticism lands and nobody's watching.
{% endhint %}
#### Scenario: Criticism Lands
**Situation:** Colleague says, "That approach was naive and ineffective."
**Living as Somebody (complete identification):**
```
Hear criticism
↓
Take personally (identity threat)
↓
Defend OR collapse
↓
Ruminate for hours/days
↓
Story solidifies: "They're wrong" OR "I'm incompetent"
```
**Result:** Suffering. Relationship damage. No learning.
**Tuesday morning:** Wrecked. Can't focus. Either defensive or ashamed.
***
**Resting as Nobody (spacious awareness):**
```
Hear criticism
↓
Notice sensation (chest tightness, heat)
↓
Recognize old pattern activating ("not enough" belief)
↓
Feel it fully WITHOUT believing the story
↓
Assess: Is there signal in this feedback?
↓
Respond clearly: "Thanks, I'll consider that" OR "I disagree, here's why"
```
**Result:** Information received. Emotion felt. Choice remains. Relationship intact.
**Tuesday morning:** Clear. Moved on. If useful feedback, integrating it.
***
#### The Measurable Difference
| Metric | Somebody | Nobody |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| **Time to recovery** | Hours to days | Minutes to hours |
| **Quality of response** | Reactive (defend/collapse) | Responsive (consider/clarify) |
| **Self-concept impact** | Identity shaken | Identity unchanged |
| **Learning available** | Low (defending) | High (assessing) |
| **Next-day function** | Impaired | Normal |
**The proof:** Not that you don't get triggered. You do. It's how fast you recognize the pattern and return to clarity.
**Learn more:** The Tuesday Test
***
### The Noticer Drill: 60-Second Practice
Want to verify this teaching directly? Try this:
{% hint style="info" %}
**Mini Practice: The Noticer**
**Time:** 60 seconds\
**Location:** Right now\
**Equipment:** None
{% endhint %}
#### Instructions
1. **Look at a common object** (coffee cup, phone, wall)
2. **Notice the seeing** before you label what it is
3. **Ask silently:** "Who knows this seeing?"
4. **Don't answer.** Just rest as the question.
5. **Notice:** There's seeing. There's knowing of seeing. What knows the knowing?
#### What You're Looking For
**Micro-shift:** A brief sense of being the space in which seeing happens, not the one doing the seeing.
**If you notice it:**
* That's Nobody. You just recognized it.
* It was there before you looked.
* It's here now.
* It'll be here after you close this page.
**If you don't notice it:**
* That's fine. Keep practicing.
* The "noticer" is what's noticing you don't notice.
* That's also Nobody.
**The point:** You can't lose awareness. You can only forget to recognize it.
***
### One-Page Integration Worksheet
When triggered, use this to shift from Somebody → Nobody → Response:
{% hint style="info" %}
**Download:** [Storyteller-Character Worksheet](https://themissingact.com/resources) (PDF)
{% endhint %}
#### The Four Questions
**1. TRIGGER — What hooked my Character?**
```
_________________________________________________________________
```
**2. STORY — What reflex story did it tell?**
```
_________________________________________________________________
```
**3. OBSERVER — What does the Storyteller see instead?**
```
_________________________________________________________________
```
**4. RESPONSE — What's the smallest kind action now?**
```
_________________________________________________________________
```
#### Example: Criticism Lands
**1. TRIGGER:** Colleague said my work was "naive and ineffective"
**2. STORY:** "They're right, I'm incompetent, I'll never be good enough"
**3. OBSERVER:** Old "not enough" belief activated. Story is repeating. The work may have issues AND I'm not fundamentally broken.
**4. RESPONSE:** Thank them. Assess feedback for signal. Revise work where useful. Remember: one critique ≠ total failure.
**The shift:** From fusion ("I am incompetent") to space ("incompetence story is running").
***
### When Storyteller vs. Character Work Gets Hard
You might be stuck if...
* Can't tell the difference between Somebody and Nobody
* Concept makes sense, but can't access the experience
* Trying to "become" Nobody instead of recognizing it
* Using Nobody language to bypass Somebody work
* Dissociating instead of creating space
* Recognition happens then immediately fades
* Tuesday Test keeps failing—no space appears when triggered
* Confused about whether you're bypassing or integrating
{% hint style="info" %}
**Support Available**
This distinction is subtle and easily misunderstood. Having someone who can point directly to the difference—and catch when you're sliding into bypass or dissociation—is often critical.
**When to consider support:**
* Can't access the experience of witnessing awareness
* Concept is clear but Tuesday Test still fails
* Unsure if you're bypassing or integrating
* Need help distinguishing dissociation from spacious awareness
* Recognition happens briefly then fades—integration isn't stabilizing
**Resources:**
* When to Get Support
* Work with Oriya
This teaching can be transmitted directly in ways that text can't replicate. If you're stuck, that's often what's needed.
{% endhint %}
***
### Act-by-Act Application
How this distinction shows up through the transformation arc:
| Act | Somebody/Nobody Pattern | What's Happening |
| ----------- | --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| **Act 1** | Complete fusion with Somebody | Can't see you're playing a character |
| **Act 2** | Somebody seeks to fix Somebody | Tools, teachers, techniques—all at character level |
| **Act 3** | Somebody dissolves (terrifying) | Identity structure collapses, Nobody glimpsed |
| **Beat 11** | Nobody recognized directly | "Oh—I've always been this" |
| **Act 4** | Nobody plays Somebody consciously | Integration: role continues, fusion doesn't |
| **Act 0** | Recognition stabilizes | Nobody is obvious, constant, ordinary |
**See the full arc:**
* Act 2: Seeking — Character trying to fix character
* Act 3: Journey In — Character dissolves
* Beat 11: Remembering — Recognition event
* Act 4: The Missing Act — Integrated living
* Act 0: Divine Play — The ever-present ground
***
### The Meta-Teaching: This Framework Is Also a Character
Here's the recursive joke:
You're using **Storyteller vs. Character** to understand you're the storyteller, not the character.
But "Storyteller vs. Character" is itself a character. A teaching-character. Training wheels.
**Eventually:** You'll see there's no Storyteller separate from Character. No Nobody separate from Somebody. No awareness separate from experience.
**Just:** This. Appearing as character-playing, recognition, and the teaching about both.
**But you can't know that from inside the confusion.**
So use this map. Take it seriously. Practice the distinction.
**Then:** Recognize the map is also what you're mapping.
At that point, Storyteller vs. Character has done its job.
Frame it. Burn it. Laugh at it. All three.
{% hint style="success" %}
**Remember**
All training wheels are designed to be outgrown.
This distinction is provisional. Use it to create space. Then you won't need it.
That's not failure. That's **graduation**.
**Act 0 is always here.** Storyteller and Character are just how it plays.
{% endhint %}
***
### Navigate From Here
**Core Framework:**
* Act 0: Divine Play — The ground this all appears in
* The Five Acts Overview — Where this teaching fits in the arc
**Related Beats:**
* Beat 11: Remembering — The recognition event
* Act 4: The Missing Act — Living as Nobody playing Somebody
**Key Concepts:**
* Training Wheels — When to use frameworks, when to drop them
* Integration vs. Bypassing — Real recognition vs. spiritual performance
* The Tuesday Test — Observable proof standard
**Practices:**
* Pattern Recognition — Learning to watch the character
* Surrender Practice — Dropping into Nobody
* Discernment Practice — Nobody choosing as Somebody
**Support:**
* When to Get Support — Signs you need a guide
* Work with Oriya — Direct transmission
***
### Sources & Further Reading
#### Neuroscience & Psychology
* Menon, V. & Uddin, L.Q. (2010). ["Saliency, switching, attention and control"](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899886/) — DMN and narrative self
* Raichle, M. (2015). ["The Brain's Default Mode Network"](https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030) — Neural basis of self-referential processing
* Brewer, J. et al. (2011). ["Meditation experience associated with decreased DMN activity"](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112029108) — How practice affects identity network
* McAdams, D. (2001). ["The Psychology of Life Stories"](https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100) — Narrative identity construction
* Hayes, S. et al. (2001). [*Relational Frame Theory*](https://contextualscience.org/relational_frame_theory) — Self-as-context vs. conceptualized self
#### Developmental Psychology
* Kegan, R. [*The Evolving Self*](https://hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674272316) — Subject-object development
#### Contemplative Traditions
* Ramana Maharshi. [Self-inquiry teachings](https://www.sriramanamaharshi.org/) — "Who am I?"
* Nisargadatta Maharaj. *I Am That* — Pure awareness teaching
* Adyashanti. [*The End of Your World*](https://www.adyashanti.org/) — Post-awakening integration
* Tolle, E. (2004). *The Power of Now* — "You are not the thinker"
#### Applied Integration
* This framework: Act 0 → Act 4 mapping of subject/object shift
* The Tuesday Test: Behavioral verification of recognition
***
{% hint style="info" %}
**Final Note**
If this page created space—even briefly—the teaching landed.
If it didn't, that's also fine. Not every map works for every person at every time.
Try the 60-second practice. Or ignore this completely and keep living.
**Either way:** Nobody is already here. You can't lose what you are.
{% endhint %}
---
# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.
## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:
```
GET https://wiki.oriya.live/core-concepts/storyteller-vs-character.md?ask=&goal=
```
`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.